<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A lost decade&#8230;are you sure? And, what&#8217;s in for 2010?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/</link>
	<description>There Is Nothing To Fear From Truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darvas boxes</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Darvas boxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Just wondering if any active traders are starting to trade the ETFs? After reading the book by Larry Connors - High Probability ETF Trading - I switched and I would say overall my results have improved but there are fewer trading opportunities because of the small number of ETFs he writes about. ETFs seem to be a little less erratic in their price movement so that&#039;s good but some of them have poor results using the systems he describes in the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if any active traders are starting to trade the ETFs? After reading the book by Larry Connors &#8211; High Probability ETF Trading &#8211; I switched and I would say overall my results have improved but there are fewer trading opportunities because of the small number of ETFs he writes about. ETFs seem to be a little less erratic in their price movement so that&#8217;s good but some of them have poor results using the systems he describes in the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aetna quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>aetna quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-669</guid>
		<description>The US will not be far behind Britain in inflation. You can&#039;t keep printing money and borrowing money and not expect inflation to occcur. No solutions from Washington, as they are opposed ideologically, to doing what is needed, which is broad-based business tax cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US will not be far behind Britain in inflation. You can&#8217;t keep printing money and borrowing money and not expect inflation to occcur. No solutions from Washington, as they are opposed ideologically, to doing what is needed, which is broad-based business tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-126</guid>
		<description>January 11, 2010 

IN TODAY&#039;S EDITION OF BREAKFAST WITH DAVE

• Market thoughts to start off the week — the risk trade is back big time

• From the sublime to the ridiculous — this continues to be the Houdini market; it goes up on any news, good or bad

• One overvalued market — on a normalized Shiller P/E basis, the S&amp;P 500 is currently overvalued by 27%

• Fiscal drag? U.S. states were forced to cut spending by 5.4% last year and not even that closed the massive fiscal gap caused by a record 12.5% slide in the revenue base

• An ongoing credit contraction in the U.S. — consumer credit plunged a record $17.5 billion in November

• Shortage of income — as we saw in last Friday’s average hourly earnings data, there is precious little income growth to be found in the labour market

• Holiday shopping in the U.S. came in better than expected

• U.S. commercial real estate in a deep funk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January 11, 2010 </p>
<p>IN TODAY&#8217;S EDITION OF BREAKFAST WITH DAVE</p>
<p>• Market thoughts to start off the week — the risk trade is back big time</p>
<p>• From the sublime to the ridiculous — this continues to be the Houdini market; it goes up on any news, good or bad</p>
<p>• One overvalued market — on a normalized Shiller P/E basis, the S&amp;P 500 is currently overvalued by 27%</p>
<p>• Fiscal drag? U.S. states were forced to cut spending by 5.4% last year and not even that closed the massive fiscal gap caused by a record 12.5% slide in the revenue base</p>
<p>• An ongoing credit contraction in the U.S. — consumer credit plunged a record $17.5 billion in November</p>
<p>• Shortage of income — as we saw in last Friday’s average hourly earnings data, there is precious little income growth to be found in the labour market</p>
<p>• Holiday shopping in the U.S. came in better than expected</p>
<p>• U.S. commercial real estate in a deep funk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yieldpig</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Yieldpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Something is only as lost as you allow it to be. Yes..it was a fairly awful decade. But, you can always find decent stuff to buy if you scrounge around enough.
.-= Yieldpig´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Yieldpig/~3/fN7p5NnPG0Q/you-say-you-want-resolution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You say you want a resolution...&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something is only as lost as you allow it to be. Yes..it was a fairly awful decade. But, you can always find decent stuff to buy if you scrounge around enough.<br />
.-= Yieldpig´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Yieldpig/~3/fN7p5NnPG0Q/you-say-you-want-resolution.html" rel="nofollow">You say you want a resolution&#8230;</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldstandard</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>goldstandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Hi Petra, I am referring to the chart that you share: http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/01/02/business/economy/02chartsGrfx.html

showing 0.2% annual yiel for developed markets (equals more or less US markets).
My point is: in the US, people expect dividends on regular basis, so I guess dividend payments are higher there than elsewher. But do not have any numbers to prove it. Have a nice day, G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Petra, I am referring to the chart that you share: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/01/02/business/economy/02chartsGrfx.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/01/02/business/economy/02chartsGrfx.html</a></p>
<p>showing 0.2% annual yiel for developed markets (equals more or less US markets).<br />
My point is: in the US, people expect dividends on regular basis, so I guess dividend payments are higher there than elsewher. But do not have any numbers to prove it. Have a nice day, G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-75</guid>
		<description>May be you are right, well in october it had 100 P/E on a trailing basis, now I do not know......

This is from September, the Market continued the RallY and I do not really know what earnings did, Rosenberg still is Prudent, you should consider subscribing to his newsletter(its free), I consider it the Best (David Rosenberg at Gluskin Sheff)......

articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/caution-this-rally-is-out-of-hand.aspx

here is some of Rosenberg:

seekingalpha.com/instablog/3452-scott-s-investments/12210-rosenberg-market-not-cheap-treasuries-could-rally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be you are right, well in october it had 100 P/E on a trailing basis, now I do not know&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>This is from September, the Market continued the RallY and I do not really know what earnings did, Rosenberg still is Prudent, you should consider subscribing to his newsletter(its free), I consider it the Best (David Rosenberg at Gluskin Sheff)&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/caution-this-rally-is-out-of-hand.aspx</p>
<p>here is some of Rosenberg:</p>
<p>seekingalpha.com/instablog/3452-scott-s-investments/12210-rosenberg-market-not-cheap-treasuries-could-rally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petra</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Petra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Manuel, I&#039;m not sure where you&#039;ve got your figures of trailing P/E over 100 and 40, resp. S&amp;P 500&#039;s P/E is around 20 at the end of 2009 (on operating basis). Let&#039;s not forget that those multiples are against extremely depressed earnings. P/E on a forward basis, with current forecasts for 2010 earnings, comes to about 15 (as compared to the historical average of 15.7). The Wall Street Journal predicts S&amp;P 500 earnings growth of 21%-30% in 2010, which may not be too optimistic given the very low levels of 2009. 

Goldstandard - which chart are you referring to? I haven&#039;t seen any showing 2% gain on US equities in the last decade...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manuel, I&#8217;m not sure where you&#8217;ve got your figures of trailing P/E over 100 and 40, resp. S&amp;P 500&#8242;s P/E is around 20 at the end of 2009 (on operating basis). Let&#8217;s not forget that those multiples are against extremely depressed earnings. P/E on a forward basis, with current forecasts for 2010 earnings, comes to about 15 (as compared to the historical average of 15.7). The Wall Street Journal predicts S&amp;P 500 earnings growth of 21%-30% in 2010, which may not be too optimistic given the very low levels of 2009. </p>
<p>Goldstandard &#8211; which chart are you referring to? I haven&#8217;t seen any showing 2% gain on US equities in the last decade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldstandard</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>goldstandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-69</guid>
		<description>HI Petra, just a short comment. The chart showing 2% gain of US equities over the last decade does not consider dividends reinvested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Petra, just a short comment. The chart showing 2% gain of US equities over the last decade does not consider dividends reinvested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/a-lost-decade-are-you-sure-and-whats-in-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyhoneyblog.com/?p=347#comment-68</guid>
		<description>the Market is verY overvalued on a P/E Basis, S&amp;P is at P/E  of over100 on a trailing Earnings basis, around 40 on operating earnings and over the average forward P/E, Schillers P/E10 is also in an overvalued stage, so earnings have to catch up significantly, I would be very prudent for 2010......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Market is verY overvalued on a P/E Basis, S&amp;P is at P/E  of over100 on a trailing Earnings basis, around 40 on operating earnings and over the average forward P/E, Schillers P/E10 is also in an overvalued stage, so earnings have to catch up significantly, I would be very prudent for 2010&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

